In their continued effort to somehow make sense of the embarrassing loss of Hillary Clinton, the Dems keep trying to push the narrative of Russian hacking of both the DNC and the RNC, but selectively releasing emails from DNC staffers in order to damage Hillary Clinton, yet withholding RNC staffer emails in order to help Donald Trump. In fact, the Washington Post and the New York Times reported on Friday that U.S. intelligence agencies have “high confidence” that the Russian hacked both the RNC and the DNC. All this from an “unnamed source.”
Democrats should look somewhere else for an explanation for Hillary’s loss, Priebus suggested:
“The Russians didn’t tell Hillary Clinton to ignore Wisconsin and Michigan, OK? I mean, I know it’s — this is this insane analysis. She lost the election because her ideas were bad. She didn’t fit the electorate. She ignored states that she shouldn’t have, and Donald Trump was the change agent, OK?
Priebus said the Republican National Committee contacted the FBI “months ago,” after the Democrat National Committee was hacked, and the FBI “reviewed all of our systems. We have hacking detection systems in place. And the conclusion was then, as it was again two days ago, when we went back to the FBI to ask them about this, that the RNC was not hacked,” Priebus said.
“So here we are now debating and talking about a story based on something that isn’t true.”
Priebus noted that news reports are “based on unnamed sources who are perhaps doing something they shouldn’t be doing by speaking to reporters, or someone talking out of line about something that is absolutely not true.”
Priebus called it “unbelievable” that the press would “run with unnamed sources about something that they agree was inconclusive, but ignore the fact that the actual people involved on the other side of this story are telling you it’s not true.”
Sounds like liberals pushing fake news to me…